Constitutional Problem Parameters in Determining the Special Status of Surakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62193/0k66cx03Keywords:
constitutional justice, decentralization, historical identity, legal equality, legal politicsAbstract
The proposal to designate Surakarta as a Special Region has reignited debates within the realm of Indonesian constitutional law. This study aims to examine the legal policy direction of the proposal by assessing its compatibility with the principles of constitutional justice and decentralization. The research employs a normative juridical approach and comparative analysis with other special regions, such as Yogyakarta and Aceh. The findings indicate that the absence of explicit legal parameters in Article 18B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution opens space for the politicization of history and the influence of local elite interests. This study proposes two key recommendations: first, the urgency of enacting a specific law that outlines formal legal criteria for special status; second, the importance of developing a regional distinctiveness index as a data-based evaluative instrument. The study concludes that recognition of special status must be grounded in objective standards to ensure equitable decentralization and avoid symbolic, short-term political interests.
Downloads
References
Agnew, John. Globalization and Sovereignty: Beyond the Territorial Trap. London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, 2017.
Anderson, George, and Sujit Choudhry. Territory and Power in Constitutional Transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Arban, Erika. Italian Regionalism and the Federal Challenge: Reconciling Economic Regionalism and Solidarity. Cham: Springer Nature, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31543-5_1.
Azmy ElBerry, Nada, and Stijn Goeminne. “Fiscal Transparency, Fiscal Forecasting and Budget Credibility in Developing Countries.” Journal of Forecasting 40, no. 1 (2021): 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2695.
Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers. Law and Social Theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
Behnke, Nathalie, and Arthur Benz. “Chapter 20: Federalism and Federal Systems.” In Handbook on Federalism, 2024. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781803929095/book-part-9781803929095-28.xml.
Bouchard, Gérard. National Myths: Constructed Pasts, Contested Presents. London: Routledge, 2013.
Dardanelli, Paolo, et al. “Dynamic De/Centralization in Federations: Comparative Conclusions.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy037.
Davidson, Joe P. L. “From the Future to the Past (and Back Again?): A Review of Aleida Assmann’s Is Time Out of Joint? On the Rise and Fall of the Modern Time Regime.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 35, no. 4 (December 1, 2022): 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-021-09412-9.
Fraser, Nancy. “Recognition or Redistribution? A Critical Reading of Iris Young’s Justice and the Politics of Difference.” Journal of Political Philosophy 3, no. 2 (1995): 166–180.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Lure of Technocracy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
Ikhsan, Ikhsan, et al. “The Abundance of Special Autonomy Funds: An Ironic Portrait of Aceh’s Poverty Alleviation.” Journal of Government and Civil Society 7, no. 1 (May 1, 2023): 96–108. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v7i1.6441.
Jane McAdam. “Self-Determination and Self-Governance for Communities Relocated across International Borders: The Quest for Banaban Independence.” International Journal of Minority and Group Rights, November 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02404001.
Kelsen, Hans. The Pure Theory of Law. 2nd ed. Translated by M. Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
Mark Turner, et al. Decentralisation in Indonesia: Redesigning the State. Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press, 2003. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/9620158?q&sort=holdings+desc&_=1585276044071&versionId=46347830.
Mietzner, Marcus. Authoritarian Innovations in Indonesia: Electoral Narrowing, Identity Politics and Executive Illiberalism. New York: Routledge, 2020.
Mietzner, Marcus. “Authoritarian Innovations in Indonesia: Electoral Narrowing, Identity Politics and Executive Illiberalism.” Democratization 27, no. 6 (August 17, 2020): 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266.
Nurfurqon, Ardika. “Politik Hukum Otonomi Daerah Studi Terhadap Desentralisasi Asimetris Di Indonesia.” Khazanah Hukum 2, no. 2 (August 19, 2020): 73–81. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v2i2.8504.
Requejo, Ferran. “Federalism and Nationalism: The Spanish Case in Comparative Perspective.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40, no. 4 (2010): 587–615.
Tushnet, Mark. Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
Tushnet, Mark. The New Fourth Branch: Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zulfa Zainuddin, Nana Charles Nguindip (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
